IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Sawicky Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-09-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Osseo USHS-MN 26 13 4 17 0.654 0.1760 0.1760 0.1588 0.1588
2020-21 Osseo USHS-MN 19 6 4 10 0.526 0.1417 0.1417 0.1278 0.1278
2021-22 Osseo USHS-MN 26 19 9 28 1.077 0.2899 0.2899 0.2616 0.2616
2022-23 Osseo USHS-MN 26 25 13 38 1.462 0.3934 0.3934 0.3550 0.3550
2023-24 Rochester Grizzlies NA3HL 42 24 20 44 1.048 0.2409 0.2415 — —
2024-25 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 53 6 10 16 0.302 0.1196 0.1152 0.3170 0.3053
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bethel D3 MIAC FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29896
Forward overall
#1764
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Linart
Saint Anselm · 2021-22
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Gerson
Utica · 2015-16
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Vinson
Southern Maine · 2024-25
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.