IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Gerson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-09-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 10 0 1 1 0.100 0.0367 0.0368 0.1056 0.1058
2015-16 Hampton Roads Whalers USPHL-Elite 44 30 31 61 1.386 0.1280 0.1223 0.3175 0.3033
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Utica D3 UCHC SR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Utica D3 UCHC JR 22 3 5 8 0.364
2017-18 Utica D3 UCHC SO 23 8 10 18 0.783
2016-17 Utica D3 UCHC FR 9 1 1 2 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2016-17 · Utica
+194.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31879
Forward overall
#1292
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Linart
Saint Anselm · 2021-22
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Vinson
Southern Maine · 2024-25
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Christian
St. Thomas · 2017-18
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.