IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mason Campbell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-10-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Rosemount USHS-MN 27 10 21 31 1.148 0.1453 0.1453 0.2789 0.2789
2020-21 Minot Minotauros NAHL 39 2 10 12 0.308 0.1130 0.1130 0.3248 0.3248
2021-22 — NAHL 56 7 20 27 0.482 0.1771 0.1707 0.5089 0.4905
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint John's D3 MIAC SR 27 5 10 15 0.556
2024-25 Saint John's D3 MIAC JR 25 4 8 12 0.480
2023-24 Saint John's D3 MIAC SO 25 4 3 7 0.280
2022-23 Saint John's D3 MIAC FR 25 6 10 16 0.640
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2022-23 · Saint John's
+322.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6996
Defenseman overall
#1505
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josiah Roen
Bethel · 2017-18
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Arthur Gordon
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Wendorf
Hamline · 2016-17
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.