← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Wendorf Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-09-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Bloomington Jefferson High USHS-MN 25 11 10 21 0.840 0.1063 0.0986 0.2040 0.1892
2015-16 Willmar WarHawks NA3HL 47 22 23 45 0.957 0.1202 0.1198 0.3023 0.3014
2016-17 Willmar WarHawks NA3HL 46 24 32 56 1.217 0.1528 0.1446 0.3843 0.3637
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Hamline D1 MIAC SR 5 1 0 1 0.200
2020-21 Hamline D3 MIAC SR 5 1 0 1 0.200
2019-20 Hamline D1 MIAC JR 25 5 1 6 0.240
2019-20 Hamline D3 MIAC JR 25 5 1 6 0.240
2018-19 Hamline D1 MIAC SO 21 0 3 3 0.143
2018-19 Hamline D3 MIAC SO 21 0 3 3 0.143
2017-18 Hamline D3 MIAC FR 25 7 3 10 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2017-18 · Hamline
+246.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21604
Forward overall
#863
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Johnson & Wales · 2022-23
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2023-24
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2008-09
0.607 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.