IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Wendorf Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-09-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Bloomington Jefferson High USHS-MN 25 11 10 21 0.840 0.2261 0.2097 0.2040 0.1892
2015-16 Willmar WarHawks NA3HL 47 22 23 45 0.957 0.1154 0.1150 0.3024 0.3015
2016-17 Willmar WarHawks NA3HL 46 24 32 56 1.217 0.1467 0.1388 0.3846 0.3639
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Hamline D3 MIAC SR 5 1 0 1 0.200
2019-20 Hamline D3 MIAC JR 25 5 1 6 0.240
2018-19 Hamline D3 MIAC SO 21 0 3 3 0.143
2017-18 Hamline D3 MIAC FR 25 7 3 10 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2017-18 · Hamline
+261.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26816
Forward overall
#1144
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Donnie Hallmark
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2008-09
0.607 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dennis Kubat
St. Scholastica · 2007-08
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Riley Riddell
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2006-07
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.