IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Donnie Hallmark Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-09-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 38 2 2 4 0.105 0.0621 0.0670 0.3163 0.3414
2006-07 — USHL 57 4 9 13 0.228 0.1346 0.1383 0.6851 0.7042
2007-08 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 48 11 14 25 0.521 0.3072 0.3000 1.5642 1.5276
2008-09 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 54 18 14 32 0.593 0.3496 0.3258 1.7798 1.6586
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SO 21 3 2 5 0.238
2009-10 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC FR 28 6 11 17 0.607
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.61
2009-10 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+124.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16159
Forward overall
#606
Forward born in 1988
#1562
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brad Olson
Manhattanville · 2000-01
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Selleck
SUNY Oswego · 2007-08
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Fredericks
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.