← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josiah Roen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-10-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Legacy Christian Academy USHS-MN 23 16 12 28 1.217 0.1541 0.1510 0.2957 0.2898
2016-17 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 44 13 10 23 0.523 0.0656 0.0655 0.1650 0.1648
2017-18 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 43 28 16 44 1.023 0.1284 0.1217 0.3231 0.3063
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Bethel D3 MIAC SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Bethel D1 MIAC JR 7 1 1 2 0.286
2020-21 Bethel D3 MIAC JR 7 1 1 2 0.286
2019-20 Bethel D1 MIAC SO 25 10 5 15 0.600
2019-20 Bethel D3 MIAC SO 25 10 5 15 0.600
2018-19 Bethel D1 MIAC FR 25 6 6 12 0.480
2018-19 Bethel D3 MIAC FR 25 6 6 12 0.480
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2018-19 · Bethel
+465.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25502
Forward overall
#1153
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Potsdam · 2005-06
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Anselm · 2021-22
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2021-22
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.