IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Paul Marcoux Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-08-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 55 7 5 12 0.218 0.0617 0.0645 0.1375 0.1437
2007-08 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 62 19 19 38 0.613 0.1734 0.1719 0.3862 0.3829
2008-09 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 62 35 30 65 1.048 0.2966 0.2794 0.6606 0.6224
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 St. Scholastica D3 — SR 26 9 11 20 0.769
2012-13 St. Scholastica D3 — SR 25 7 11 18 0.720
2011-12 St. Scholastica D3 — JR 20 3 3 6 0.300
2010-11 St. Scholastica D3 — SO 26 6 5 11 0.423
2009-10 St. Scholastica D3 — FR 6 1 1 2 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2009-10 · St. Scholastica
+64.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19707
Forward overall
#819
Forward born in 1988
#491
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Pat Egan
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Wiesner
Babson · 2017-18
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Logar
Buffalo State · 2017-18
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.