← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Wiesner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-08-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 41 20 27 47 1.146 0.2460 0.2620 0.5613 0.5978
2016-17 NAHL 54 6 18 24 0.444 0.1650 0.1650 0.4705 0.4705
2017-18 Northeast Generals NAHL 57 20 20 40 0.702 0.2606 0.2477 0.7431 0.7064
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Babson D3 LittleEast SR 27 11 12 23 0.852
2020-21 Babson D3 LittleEast JR 8 3 5 8 1.000
2019-20 Babson D3 LittleEast SO 25 11 16 27 1.080
2018-19 Babson D3 LittleEast FR 26 16 7 23 0.885
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.88
2018-19 · Babson
+381.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
35%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17013
Forward overall
#698
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2000-01
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2005-06
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2011-12
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.