IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Terry Leabo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-08-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 — NAHL 52 4 24 28 0.538 0.1999 0.1997 0.5702 0.5695
2013-14 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 60 5 16 21 0.350 0.1300 0.1233 0.3706 0.3516
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SR 8 1 2 3 0.375
2016-17 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen JR 27 1 5 6 0.222
2015-16 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SO 28 2 7 9 0.321
2014-15 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 27 4 15 19 0.704
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.70
2014-15 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+384.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6458
Defenseman overall
#1015
Defenseman born in 1993
#2937
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Casey Nelson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aaron Aragon
New England · 2017-18
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Devyn Orpana
Adrian · 2021-22
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Egan Schmitt
Babson · 2021-22
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.