IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Devyn Orpana Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-07-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Navan Grads CCHL 62 22 21 43 0.694 0.1979 0.1979 0.5368 0.5368
2020-21 Navan Grads CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Navan Grads CCHL 42 25 27 52 1.238 0.3534 0.3292 0.9584 0.8927
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 12 6 6 12 1.000
2024-25 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 12 0 1 1 0.083
2023-24 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 3 2 1 3 1.000
2022-23 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 7 1 1 2 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2022-23 · Adrian
1.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11277
Forward overall
#331
Forward born in 2001
#204
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Romano
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Storjohann
SUNY Cortland · 2016-17
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jackson Leef
Westfield State · 2012-13
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.