IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Storjohann Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-09-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Richmond Generals USPHL-Elite 42 17 40 57 1.357 0.1627 0.1633 0.3116 0.3128
2016-17 Kirkland Lake Gold Miners NOJHL 46 20 53 73 1.587 0.2676 0.2516 0.6594 0.6199
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC — 26 6 9 15 0.577
2019-20 SUNY Cortland D3 — JR 20 8 9 17 0.850
2018-19 SUNY Cortland D3 — SO 24 9 6 15 0.625
2017-18 SUNY Cortland D3 — FR 23 6 7 13 0.565
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2017-18 · SUNY Cortland
+205.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23457
Forward overall
#980
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ron Lindgren
Aurora · 2013-14
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Pat Egan
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Wiesner
Babson · 2017-18
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.