IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Phillip Middleton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-09-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2013-14 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 27 1 1 2 0.074 0.0275 0.0290 0.0785 0.0828
2014-15 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 51 8 17 25 0.490 0.1908 0.1903 0.7149 0.7130
2015-16 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 58 0 19 19 0.328 0.1275 0.1203 0.4777 0.4508
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SR 25 1 5 6 0.240
2018-19 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — JR 27 3 2 5 0.185
2017-18 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SO 26 4 7 11 0.423
2016-17 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — FR 26 5 11 16 0.615
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2016-17 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+339.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9312
Defenseman overall
#1353
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Zink
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Walker Hamilton
Framingham State · 2016-17
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Hopfner
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2013-14
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitchell Dolter
St. Olaf · 2017-18
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.