IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jory McWilliams Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-12-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Bloomington Kennedy High USHS-MN 25 10 22 32 1.280 0.3446 0.3403 0.3109 0.3070
2016-17 Tampa Bay Juniors USPHL-Elite 43 22 17 39 0.907 0.1087 0.1097 0.2082 0.2100
2017-18 Tampa Bay Juniors USPHL-Premier 44 47 49 96 2.182 0.2937 0.2824 0.7427 0.7142
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Bethel D3 MIAC SR 24 4 4 8 0.333
2020-21 Bethel D3 MIAC JR 8 1 2 3 0.375
2019-20 Bethel D3 MIAC SO 25 1 3 4 0.160
2018-19 Bethel D3 MIAC FR 9 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
8%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14979
Forward overall
#615
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jory Mullin
Neumann · 2012-13
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Frost
Castleton · 2010-11
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chase Nieuwendyk
SUNY Brockport · 2010-11
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.