IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Kearney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-10-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 52 17 32 49 0.942 0.2655 0.2694 0.7629 0.7740
2024-25 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 53 23 37 60 1.132 0.3190 0.3095 0.9165 0.8891
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Williams D3 NESCAC — 28 7 6 13 0.464
2003-04 Suffolk D3 — JR 24 3 13 16 0.667
2002-03 Suffolk D3 — SO 21 6 9 15 0.714
2001-02 Suffolk D3 — FR 12 2 5 7 0.583

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10691
Forward overall
#459
Forward born in 2004
#33
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Grant Everett
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2007-08
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Collins
Elmira · 2011-12
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitchell Herlihey
SUNY Oswego · 2013-14
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.