| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-05 | Oshawa Legionaires | OJHL | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.333 | 0.0931 | 0.1045 | 0.2300 | 0.2581 |
| 2005-06 | Pickering Panthers | OJHL | 43 | 4 | 12 | 16 | 0.372 | 0.1040 | 0.1129 | 0.2568 | 0.2787 |
| 2006-07 | Cobourg Cougars | OJHL | 48 | 14 | 32 | 46 | 0.958 | 0.2677 | 0.2771 | 0.6613 | 0.6845 |
| 2007-08 | Cobourg Cougars | OJHL | 36 | 18 | 28 | 46 | 1.278 | 0.3570 | 0.3534 | 0.8818 | 0.8728 |
| 2008-09 | Cobourg Cougars | OJHL | 48 | 28 | 48 | 76 | 1.583 | 0.4424 | 0.4152 | 1.0926 | 1.0254 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | SUNY Plattsburgh | D3 | — | SR | 10 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.200 |
| 2011-12 | SUNY Plattsburgh | D3 | — | JR | 25 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 0.520 |
| 2010-11 | SUNY Plattsburgh | D3 | — | SO | 21 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 1.000 |
| 2009-10 | SUNY Plattsburgh | D3 | — | FR | 27 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 0.556 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.