IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Travis Broughman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-03-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Richmond Generals USPHL-Elite 30 20 16 36 1.200 0.1108 0.1080 — —
2017-18 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 60 31 34 65 1.083 0.2350 0.2142 0.8381 0.7639
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SR 25 13 18 31 1.240
2019-20 Oswego D1 — SO 25 15 12 27 1.080
2019-20 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 25 15 12 27 1.080
2018-19 Oswego D1 — FR 27 13 10 23 0.852
2018-19 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 27 13 10 23 0.852
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.85
2018-19 · Oswego
+479.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17000
Forward overall
#751
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Arlen Marshall
Manhattanville · 2005-06
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mason Kesselring
Curry · 2024-25
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Pickup
Concordia · 2016-17
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.