IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Storm Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-03-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 52 2 10 12 0.231 0.1470 0.1460 0.6916 0.6867
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC SR 29 0 4 4 0.138
2015-16 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC JR 29 2 5 7 0.241
2014-15 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC SO 33 2 3 5 0.151
2013-14 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC FR 30 0 1 1 0.033
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.03
2013-14 · St. Cloud State
-73.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28195
Forward overall
#1148
Forward born in 1994
#3455
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Brad Hawkinson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.20 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ryan McMurphy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average
NCAAe PPG
Colin Staub
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Denver (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Andrew McDonald
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Bentley (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Dahlseide
Wisconsin-Stout · 2017-18
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Gattelaro
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2011-12
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chad Lopez
Wisconsin-Superior · 2015-16
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.