← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Dahlseide Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-04-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 St. Paul Academy USHS-MN 25 18 35 53 2.120 0.5707 0.6033 0.5149 0.5443
2016-17 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 NA3HL 38 18 30 48 1.263 0.1522 0.1560
2018-19 Mason City Toros NA3HL 44 17 43 60 1.364 0.1643 0.1598 0.4308 0.4190
2019-20 Mason City Toros NA3HL 45 25 42 67 1.489 0.1794 0.1794 0.4703 0.4703
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SR 27 5 4 9 0.333
2022-23 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC JR 28 8 19 27 0.964
2021-22 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SO 27 3 12 15 0.556
2020-21 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen FR 11 2 4 6 0.545
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2020-21 · Wisconsin-Stout
+302.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
38%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24622
Forward overall
#1005
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.14 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ New Hampshire
0.11 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Skidmore · 2015-16
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's · 2024-25
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.