IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matthew Muzyka Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-04-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Hartford Jr. Wolfpack EHL 21 6 6 12 0.571 0.1320 0.1375 0.2796 0.2912
2015-16 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 50 19 20 39 0.780 0.2616 0.2532 0.7218 0.6987
2016-17 — NAHL 5 0 2 2 0.400 0.1470 0.1371 0.4222 0.3937
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC JR 26 7 5 12 0.462
2018-19 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SO 25 9 11 20 0.800
2017-18 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC FR 26 5 9 14 0.538
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2017-18 · Skidmore
+242.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17440
Forward overall
#677
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Danny O'Donnell
Aurora · 2016-17
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Travis Quigley
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Miller
Fitchburg State · 2018-19
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.