IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Miller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-05-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Premier 31 4 6 10 0.323 0.0423 0.0416 0.1095 0.1076
2018-19 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Premier 41 12 23 35 0.854 0.1120 0.1041 0.2898 0.2694
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC — 18 2 9 11 0.611
2021-22 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC — 24 4 8 12 0.500
2019-20 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC — 26 1 11 12 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2019-20 · Fitchburg State
+517.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6455
Defenseman overall
#1349
Defenseman born in 1998
#2018
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tony DeVito
SUNY Cortland · 2015-16
0.632 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Shigenobu Kakudate
Finlandia · 2011-12
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Drew Olivieri
University of New England · 2022-23
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.