IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tony DeVito Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-05-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 50 2 14 16 0.320 0.0784 0.0835 0.2203 0.2346
2013-14 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 20 2 8 10 0.500 0.1226 0.1243 0.3443 0.3491
2014-15 Powell River Kings BCHL 45 2 11 13 0.289 0.1113 0.1091 — —
2015-16 — NAHL 54 6 17 23 0.426 0.1565 0.1473 0.4495 0.4230
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC FR 19 3 9 12 0.632
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.63
2016-17 · SUNY Cortland
+406.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11189
Defenseman overall
#1549
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joe Drabin
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2015-16
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Thorogood
Marian · 2013-14
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Shaymus Stevenson
SUNY Oswego · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.