IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shaymus Stevenson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-05-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 47 3 2 5 0.106 0.0231 0.0236 0.0823 0.0839
2022-23 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 41 8 15 23 0.561 0.1217 0.1186 0.4340 0.4231
2023-24 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 54 29 28 57 1.056 0.2290 0.2110 0.8167 0.7527
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 3 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 6 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25732
Forward overall
#1445
Forward born in 2003
#535
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Keegan Milligan
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.781 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Laplante
New England College · 2018-19
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Roman Gaudet
SUNY Morrisville · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.