← New Search ↗ Social Card

Derek Thorogood Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-05-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Calgary Canucks AJHL 54 9 10 19 0.352 0.1175 0.1206 0.3267 0.3353
2012-13 Calgary Canucks AJHL 30 11 14 25 0.833 0.2783 0.2714 0.7736 0.7543
2013-14 AJHL 54 21 23 44 0.815 0.2721 0.2512 0.7564 0.6983
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Marian D3 NCHA SR 29 15 19 34 1.172
2016-17 Marian D3 NCHA JR 27 10 15 25 0.926
2015-16 Marian D3 NCHA SO 28 9 25 34 1.214
2014-15 Marian D3 NCHA FR 27 9 5 14 0.518
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2014-15 · Marian
+133.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15760
Forward overall
#594
Forward born in 1993
#709
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Canton · 2024-25
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Morrisville · 2006-07
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2008-09
0.632 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.