← New Search ↗ Social Card

Travis Quigley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-04-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Elite 43 22 16 38 0.884 0.1060 0.1098 0.2029 0.2103
2016-17 New York Apple Core EHL 39 18 16 34 0.872 0.1871 0.1879 0.4269 0.4288
2017-18 New Jersey Rockets USPHL-Premier 38 26 19 45 1.184 0.1594 0.1485 0.4031 0.3755
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 GR 19 4 3 7 0.368
2021-22 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 SR 13 3 3 6 0.462
2020-21 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 SO 21 6 11 17 0.809
2018-19 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 FR 18 1 5 6 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2018-19 · Southern New Hampshire
+137.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26591
Forward overall
#1165
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia Wisconsin · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2005-06
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern Maine · 2014-15
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.