IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Mathieu Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-04-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Elite 39 19 18 37 0.949 0.0876 0.0817 0.4111 0.3917
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Southern Maine D1 HockeyEast SR 25 9 5 14 0.560
2018-19 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast SR 25 9 5 14 0.560
2017-18 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast JR 24 4 3 7 0.292
2016-17 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast SO 20 4 1 5 0.250
2015-16 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast FR 23 6 3 9 0.391
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2015-16 · Southern Maine
+459.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33898
Forward overall
#1321
Forward born in 1994
#178
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Danny O'Donnell
Aurora · 2016-17
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Travis Quigley
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Miller
Fitchburg State · 2018-19
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.