IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Parrottino Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-02-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Lincoln Stars USHL 7 1 0 1 0.143 0.0910 0.0899 0.4282 0.4231
2013-14 Lincoln Stars USHL 56 9 23 32 0.571 0.3639 0.3425 1.7123 1.6116
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Canisius D1 AHA SR 26 1 3 4 0.154
2017-18 Canisius D1 AHA SR 2 0 1 1 0.500
2016-17 Canisius D1 AHA JR 27 6 11 17 0.630
2015-16 Canisius D1 AHA SO 21 1 2 3 0.143
2014-15 Canisius D1 AHA FR 13 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#8632
Forward overall
#351
Forward born in 1994
#1384
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG
Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Foster
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Charlie O'Connor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Devin Loe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Beau Moyer
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Marra
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
1.161 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Reed
Curry · 2009-10
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.