icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Sioux City Musketeers | USHL | 49 | 7 | 15 | 22 | 0.449 | 0.2859 | 0.2976 | 1.3455 | 1.4008 |
| 2012-13 | Sioux City Musketeers | USHL | 13 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.231 | 0.1470 | 0.1452 | 0.6916 | 0.6832 |
| 2018-19 | Örebro HK | SHL | 52 | 6 | 16 | 22 | 0.423 | — | — | — | — |
| 2019-20 | Örebro HK | SHL | 40 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 0.275 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Clarkson | D1 | ECAC | SR | 30 | 10 | 16 | 26 | 0.867 |
| 2015-16 | Clarkson | D1 | ECAC | JR | 27 | 8 | 15 | 23 | 0.852 |
| 2014-15 | Clarkson | D1 | ECAC | SO | 25 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 0.480 |
| 2013-14 | Clarkson | D1 | ECAC | FR | 25 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 0.280 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.