← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aidan Connolly Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Dexter NE-Prep 30 9 17 26 0.867 0.1717 0.1717 0.3949 0.3949
2019-20 Dexter NE-Prep 27 11 16 27 1.000 0.1981 0.1981 0.4556 0.4556
2020-21 Maine Nordiques NAHL 53 16 11 27 0.509 0.1872 0.1872 0.5377 0.5377
2021-22 Maine Nordiques NAHL 42 21 30 51 1.214 0.4461 0.4212 1.2817 1.2100
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Salve Regina D3 CNE SR 25 10 15 25 1.000
2024-25 Salve Regina D3 CNE 15 6 6 12 0.800
2023-24 Sacred Heart D1 AHA 2 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Sacred Heart D1 AHA 15 4 0 4 0.267
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2022-23 · Sacred Heart
-6.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11965
Forward overall
#551
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salve Regina · 2016-17
1.207 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2008-09
0.842 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trinity · 2023-24
0.870 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.