IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jimmy DeVito Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-04-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Chicago Steel USHL 45 2 5 7 0.156 0.0991 0.1083 0.4663 0.5098
2011-12 Chicago Steel USHL 57 8 16 24 0.421 0.2682 0.2807 1.2619 1.3206
2012-13 Lincoln Stars USHL 57 6 14 20 0.351 0.2235 0.2220 1.0515 1.0445
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 RPI D1 — SR 37 3 3 6 0.162
2015-16 RPI D1 — JR 20 2 9 11 0.550
2014-15 RPI D1 — SO 39 1 4 5 0.128
2013-14 RPI D1 — FR 25 1 3 4 0.160
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2013-14 · RPI
-23.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19015
Forward overall
#780
Forward born in 1994
#2675
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Colin Staub
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Denver (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brad Hawkinson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.20 No data
NCAAe PPG
Alex Jackstadt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Ledford
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Air Force (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG
Andrew McDonald
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Bentley (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Parker Mismash
St. Scholastica · 2014-15
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Carter Krenke
Saint John's · 2021-22
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Braccini
Bethel · 2019-20
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.