IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mason Jobst Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-02-17 Country: USA
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 2 1 1 2 1.000 0.7433 0.7572 3.7314 3.8012
2011-12 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 32 2 8 10 0.312 0.1843 0.1918 0.9386 0.9766
2012-13 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 64 6 18 24 0.375 0.2212 0.2184 1.1263 1.1120
2013-14 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 49 10 35 45 0.918 0.5418 0.5096 2.7583 2.5943
2014-15 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 11 2 5 7 0.636 0.3754 0.3346 1.9114 1.7037
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Ohio State D1 BigTen SR 36 17 19 36 1.000
2017-18 Ohio State D1 BigTen JR 40 21 22 43 1.075
2016-17 Ohio State D1 BigTen SO 39 19 36 55 1.410
2015-16 Ohio State D1 BigTen FR 35 12 18 30 0.857
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.86
2015-16 · Ohio State
+147.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Armour
Adrian · 2014-15
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Yann Poirier
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
1.030 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Skylur Jameson
Wentworth · 2007-08
1.778 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.