← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Armour Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-04-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 45 9 10 19 0.422 0.1180 0.1305 0.2914 0.3222
2011-12 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 49 14 37 51 1.041 0.2908 0.3087 0.7183 0.7625
2012-13 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 54 13 30 43 0.796 0.2225 0.2251 0.5495 0.5559
2013-14 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 44 19 35 54 1.227 0.3429 0.3294 0.8470 0.8137
2014-15 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 51 23 41 64 1.255 0.3506 0.3187 0.8660 0.7872
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 29 4 20 24 0.828
2017-18 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 9 1 5 6 0.667
2016-17 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 21 5 14 19 0.905
2015-16 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 28 8 30 38 1.357
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.36
2015-16 · Adrian
+390.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9208
Forward overall
#377
Forward born in 1994
#361
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2011-12
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2010-11
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2018-19
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.