IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Pham Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-05-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Chicago Steel USHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2011-12 Indiana Ice USHL 50 4 8 12 0.240 0.1528 0.1607 0.7192 0.7566
2012-13 Indiana Ice USHL 61 8 16 24 0.393 0.2505 0.2502 1.1789 1.1775
2013-14 Indiana Ice USHL 57 10 12 22 0.386 0.2458 0.2340 1.1567 1.1012
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Army D1 AHA SR 36 8 16 24 0.667
2016-17 Army D1 AHA JR 37 5 16 21 0.568
2015-16 Army D1 AHA SO 37 7 16 23 0.622
2014-15 Army D1 AHA FR 32 9 20 29 0.906
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.91
2014-15 · Army
+340.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17076
Forward overall
#703
Forward born in 1994
#2498
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Bauman
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average
NCAAe PPG
Sami Salminen
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joe Anderson
Wisconsin-Stout · 2013-14
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Marinac
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Catanzaro
SUNY Cortland · 2002-03
0.958 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.