IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mackenzie MacEachern Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-03-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 — USHL 50 8 13 21 0.420 0.2675 0.2648 1.2586 1.2461
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Michigan State D1 BigTen JR 37 14 16 30 0.811
2014-15 Michigan State D1 BigTen SO 35 11 15 26 0.743
2013-14 Michigan State D1 BigTen FR 36 8 4 12 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2013-14 · Michigan State
+47.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13010
Forward overall
#533
Forward born in 1994
#1986
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Alex Jackstadt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Hunter Anderson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Mason Jobst
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy DeVito
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Colin Staub
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Denver (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tanner Congdon
Bryn Athyn · 2015-16
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Carter Krenke
Saint John's · 2022-23
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Stevens
Wisconsin-Stout · 2019-20
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.