IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zach Aman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-03-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Indiana Ice USHL 42 7 15 22 0.524 0.3220 0.3184 1.5432 1.5262
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 10 0 1 1 0.100
2014-15 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 22 2 3 5 0.227
2013-14 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 18 1 1 2 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2013-14 · Colorado College
-59.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13722
Forward overall
#573
Forward born in 1994
#1361
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Willem Nong-Lambert
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Schmidt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Bentley (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brian Morgan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Maine (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
Mackenzie MacEachern
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jack Rowe
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Arizona State (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew Dougherty
Western New England · 2018-19
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Collin Patterson
UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nolan Redler
UMass Boston · 2014-15
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.