IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Schmidt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-03-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2012-13 — USHL 58 11 22 33 0.569 0.3357 0.3330 1.7089 1.6952
2013-14 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 56 9 13 22 0.393 0.2318 0.2191 1.1800 1.1153
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Bentley D1 AHA SR 37 16 15 31 0.838
2016-17 Bentley D1 AHA JR 39 18 15 33 0.846
2015-16 Bentley D1 AHA SO 40 16 29 45 1.125
2014-15 Bentley D1 AHA FR 37 7 4 11 0.297
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2014-15 · Bentley
+31.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17430
Forward overall
#694
Forward born in 1994
#1696
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lukas Ciotti
Adrian · 2009-10
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Gavin Bloder
Fredonia · 2022-23
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Olsson
Endicott · 2014-15
1.364 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.