IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gavin Bloder Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Frederick Gunn NE-Prep 34 2 0 2 0.059 0.0116 0.0116 0.0268 0.0268
2022-23 — NCDC 40 12 6 18 0.450 0.1835 0.1813 0.3617 0.3574
2023-24 Mercer Chiefs NCDC 24 10 4 14 0.583 0.2378 0.2215 0.4689 0.4367
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SO 24 2 3 5 0.208
2024-25 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 16 8 4 12 0.750
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.75
2024-25 · Fredonia
+326.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21021
Forward overall
#1098
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sébastien Poirier
Westfield State · 2010-11
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Ryback
Concordia · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Larwood
Bethel · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.