IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aaron Ryback Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-02-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1414 0.1518 0.3150 0.3383
2013-14 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 46 23 21 44 0.957 0.1153 0.1172 0.3022 0.3071
2014-15 Steinbach Pistons MJHL 13 1 3 4 0.308 0.0870 0.0845 0.1939 0.1883
2015-16 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 45 22 27 49 1.089 0.1312 0.1205 0.3440 0.3159
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 27 4 2 6 0.222
2018-19 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 6 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 16 0 2 2 0.125
2016-17 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 5 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#36030
Forward overall
#1528
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Benshadle
Trinity · 2016-17
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Zachary Feldman
Lake Forest · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Raguseo
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.