IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zachary Feldman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-03-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 9 1 0 1 0.111 0.0413 0.0404 0.1176 0.1150
2015-16 Express Hockey Club EHL 38 6 18 24 0.632 0.1355 0.1280 0.3093 0.2922
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SR 27 1 8 9 0.333
2018-19 Lake Forest D3 NCHA JR 28 4 8 12 0.429
2017-18 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SO 28 2 3 5 0.179
2016-17 Lake Forest D3 NCHA FR 26 5 8 13 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2016-17 · Lake Forest
+469.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11335
Defenseman overall
#1549
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cameron Shorrock
Bryn Athyn · 2018-19
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Colton Kennedy
Wisconsin-Superior · 2009-10
0.316 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyson Kirkby
SUNY Oswego · 2017-18
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.