IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sébastien Poirier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-02-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 59 7 35 42 0.712 0.1544 0.1538 0.5508 0.5488
2009-10 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 33 3 22 25 0.758 0.1643 0.1561 0.5862 0.5570
2010-11 — CCHL 48 4 26 30 0.625 0.1356 0.1222 0.4836 0.4356
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Westfield State D3 MASCAC — 10 3 4 7 0.700
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.70
2011-12 · Westfield State
+446.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5843
Defenseman overall
#952
Defenseman born in 1990
#528
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aaron Ryback
Concordia · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Veneklase
SUNY Cortland · 2018-19
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Larwood
Bethel · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.