← New Search ↗ Social Card

Austin Rook Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-03-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier-Classic 28 1 8 9 0.321 0.0965 0.1010 0.2647 0.2769
2016-17 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier-Classic 19 7 14 21 1.105 0.3319 0.3311 0.9104 0.9082
2017-18 South Shore Kings NCDC 39 5 17 22 0.564 0.1590 0.1485 0.4567 0.4266
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Long Island D1 33 2 4 6 0.182
2021-22 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SR 23 8 14 22 0.957
2020-21 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SO 23 6 15 21 0.913
2018-19 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC FR 25 7 12 19 0.760
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.76
2018-19 · Skidmore
+263.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4128
Defenseman overall
#846
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2012-13
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2012-13
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.