IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dakota Mason Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-02-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2010-11 Dawson Creek Rage NAHL 53 27 24 51 0.962 0.3573 0.3667 1.0189 1.0458
2011-12 Brooks Bandits AJHL 45 12 26 38 0.844 0.2820 0.2719 0.7839 0.7558
2012-13 Brooks Bandits AJHL 55 26 41 67 1.218 0.4069 0.3714 1.1309 1.0323
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — FR 20 5 2 7 0.350
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2013-14 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+23.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7203
Forward overall
#311
Forward born in 1992
#166
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Justin Meers
Trine · 2018-19
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Zack Bross
UMass Boston · 2016-17
1.518 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Cullen Bradshaw
St. Norbert · 2010-11
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.