← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brock Krulicki Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-02-10 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Dalhousie Univ. · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Kemptville 73's CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Kemptville 73's CCHL 55 25 28 53 0.964 0.2090 0.2003 0.7455 0.7145
2022-23 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 52 28 21 49 0.942 0.3160 0.2877 0.8720 0.7940
2024-25 Dalhousie Univ. USports-M 17 1 2 3 0.176 0.0931 0.0945 0.5173 0.5250
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 20 6 3 9 0.450
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2023-24 · SUNY Oswego
+108.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26437
Forward overall
#1502
Forward born in 2002

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2016-17
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2023-24
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Middlebury · 2012-13
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.