IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colby Jaquet Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-04-12 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Univ. of Saskatchewan · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Selkirk Steelers MJHL 6 1 2 3 0.500 0.0963 0.1086 0.3153 0.3554
2018-19 Selkirk Steelers MJHL 59 6 33 39 0.661 0.1272 0.1364 0.4168 0.4470
2019-20 — MJHL 59 5 27 32 0.542 0.1044 0.1044 0.3420 0.3420
2020-21 Dauphin Kings MJHL 6 0 6 6 1.000 0.1925 0.1925 0.6306 0.6306
2021-22 Dauphin Kings MJHL 54 12 50 62 1.148 0.2210 0.2042 0.7240 0.6690
2022-23 Univ. of Saskatchewan USports-M 14 0 2 2 0.143 0.0754 0.0810 0.4188 0.4499
2023-24 Univ. of Saskatchewan USports-M 12 1 10 11 0.917 0.4837 0.4940 2.6868 2.7441
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Utica D3 UCHC — 4 1 1 2 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2024-25 · Utica
+61.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2794
Defenseman overall
#651
Defenseman born in 2001

D2/3 Comparables

Conor Landrigan
Utica · 2016-17
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Joona Juntunen
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2023-24
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Christopher Miraldo
Westfield State · 2022-23
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.