IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Conor Landrigan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-03-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights EHL 16 2 3 5 0.312 0.0671 0.0729 0.1530 0.1662
2015-16 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 13 1 2 3 0.231 0.0495 0.0493 0.1130 0.1125
2016-17 Bay State Bobcats NA3HL 45 52 70 122 2.711 0.3267 0.3012 0.8564 0.7896
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Utica D3 UCHC SR 10 9 15 24 2.400
2019-20 Utica D3 UCHC JR 22 13 28 41 1.864
2018-19 Utica D3 UCHC SO 28 10 12 22 0.786
2017-18 Utica D3 UCHC FR 26 14 13 27 1.038
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.04
2017-18 · Utica
+505.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22957
Forward overall
#955
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Zappia
SUNY Cortland · 2010-11
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dalton Jay
Westfield State · 2011-12
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Johnson
Saint John's · 2018-19
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.