← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Veneklase Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-03-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Dayton Falcons NA3HL 45 4 8 12 0.267 0.0335 0.0358 0.0842 0.0900
2016-17 Dayton Falcons NA3HL 47 14 18 32 0.681 0.0855 0.0871 0.2150 0.2190
2017-18 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Premier 42 13 17 30 0.714 0.0934 0.0910 0.2424 0.2361
2018-19 Seahawks Hockey EHL 46 21 29 50 1.087 0.2511 0.2363 0.5319 0.5006
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SR 23 5 7 12 0.522
2021-22 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC JR 25 4 3 7 0.280
2019-20 Cortland D1 FR 15 2 4 6 0.400
2019-20 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC FR 15 2 4 6 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2019-20 · Cortland
+162.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17721
Forward overall
#842
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Suffolk · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2015-16
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2013-14
0.759 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.