IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean Perichak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-03-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Caledon Admirals OJHL 38 6 5 11 0.289 0.0809 0.0895 0.1998 0.2211
2012-13 — OJHL 52 7 11 18 0.346 0.0967 0.1022 0.2389 0.2524
2013-14 Oakville Blades OJHL 38 7 6 13 0.342 0.0956 0.0961 0.2361 0.2374
2014-15 King Rebellion OJHL 54 16 22 38 0.704 0.1966 0.1875 0.4856 0.4632
2015-16 — OJHL 43 8 28 36 0.837 0.2339 0.2102 0.5778 0.5192
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 SUNY Cortland D3 — SR 22 5 16 21 0.955
2018-19 SUNY Cortland D3 — JR 14 4 6 10 0.714
2017-18 SUNY Cortland D3 — SO 18 3 8 11 0.611
2016-17 SUNY Cortland D3 — FR 25 5 10 15 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2016-17 · SUNY Cortland
+248.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21421
Forward overall
#846
Forward born in 1995
#1654
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Corcoran
St. Scholastica · 2008-09
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Carter Cowlthorp
Norwich · 2016-17
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Philip Elgstam
Norwich · 2018-19
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.