← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean Perichak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-03-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Caledon Admirals OJHL 38 6 5 11 0.289 0.0710 0.0786 0.1993 0.2205
2012-13 OJHL 52 7 11 18 0.346 0.0849 0.0897 0.2384 0.2519
2013-14 Oakville Blades OJHL 38 7 6 13 0.342 0.0838 0.0843 0.2355 0.2368
2014-15 King Rebellion OJHL 54 16 22 38 0.704 0.1725 0.1645 0.4845 0.4622
2015-16 OJHL 43 8 28 36 0.837 0.2052 0.1844 0.5764 0.5180
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Cortland D1 SR 22 5 16 21 0.955
2019-20 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SR 22 5 16 21 0.955
2018-19 Cortland D1 JR 14 4 6 10 0.714
2018-19 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC JR 14 4 6 10 0.714
2017-18 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SO 18 3 8 11 0.611
2016-17 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC FR 25 5 10 15 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2016-17 · SUNY Cortland
+297.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27671
Forward overall
#1080
Forward born in 1995
#1359
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2016-17
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2008-09
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2003-04
0.870 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.