IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Lappin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-03-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Brockville Braves CCHL 44 3 6 9 0.204 0.0584 0.0588 0.1583 0.1593
2014-15 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier-Classic 28 5 12 17 0.607 0.1823 0.1814 0.5001 0.4976
2015-16 Connecticut Jr. Rangers USPHL-Premier-Classic 41 17 24 41 1.000 0.3003 0.2841 0.8237 0.7793
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Suffolk D3 CNE SR 11 0 1 1 0.091
2018-19 Suffolk D3 CNE JR 12 2 2 4 0.333
2017-18 Suffolk D3 CNE SO 11 2 2 4 0.364
2016-17 Suffolk D3 CNE FR 18 3 6 9 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2016-17 · Suffolk
+140.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19218
Forward overall
#744
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Johnson
Saint John's · 2018-19
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Zappia
SUNY Cortland · 2010-11
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Robert Clerc
SUNY Potsdam · 2017-18
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.