IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Larwood Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-03-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Breezy Point North Stars NA3HL 40 9 13 22 0.550 0.0701 0.0714 0.1740 0.1772
2015-16 Breezy Point North Stars NA3HL 44 16 24 40 0.909 0.1158 0.1123 0.2875 0.2788
2016-17 Breezy Point North Stars NA3HL 33 14 22 36 1.091 0.1390 0.1277 0.3451 0.3172
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Bethel D1 MIAC FR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Bethel D3 MIAC — 2 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#26866
Forward overall
#1112
Forward born in 1996
#826
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Valentin Sverdlov
Castleton · 2017-18
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Raguseo
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Zachary Feldman
Lake Forest · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.