← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Raguseo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-03-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 41 2 12 14 0.342 0.0954 0.1049 0.2357 0.2592
2009-10 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 44 5 10 15 0.341 0.0952 0.0997 0.2353 0.2464
2010-11 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 39 3 18 21 0.538 0.1505 0.1506 0.3716 0.3719
2011-12 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 44 9 25 34 0.773 0.2159 0.2065 0.5332 0.5100
2012-13 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 51 7 29 36 0.706 0.1972 0.1788 0.4871 0.4417
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 SUNY Oswego D3 SR 27 3 15 18 0.667
2015-16 SUNY Oswego D3 JR 24 2 6 8 0.333
2014-15 SUNY Oswego D3 SO 25 4 11 15 0.600
2013-14 SUNY Oswego D3 FR 20 2 7 9 0.450
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2013-14 · SUNY Oswego
+151.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4473
Defenseman overall
#917
Defenseman born in 1992
#1623
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2014-15
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2007-08
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2015-16
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.