IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Ingraham Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-03-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Williams Lake TimberWolves BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2005-06 Abitibi Eskimos NOJHL 41 9 13 22 0.537 0.0905 0.0925 0.2230 0.2279
2006-07 — NOJHL 43 14 26 40 0.930 0.1568 0.1528 0.3865 0.3767
2007-08 Manitoulin Islanders NOJHL 50 21 34 55 1.100 0.1855 0.1701 0.4571 0.4191
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#26816
Forward overall
#1031
Forward born in 1987

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joseph Sposit
Nichols · 2010-11
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Brown
SUNY Cortland · 2014-15
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason McAloon
Lake Forest · 2010-11
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.