IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Ingraham Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-03-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Williams Lake TimberWolves BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2005-06 Abitibi Eskimos NOJHL 41 9 13 22 0.537 0.0896 0.0916 0.2234 0.2283
2006-07 — NOJHL 43 14 26 40 0.930 0.1553 0.1514 0.3872 0.3774
2007-08 Manitoulin Islanders NOJHL 50 21 34 55 1.100 0.1837 0.1684 0.4579 0.4199
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#25686
Forward overall
#834
Forward born in 1987

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jaden Condotta
Aurora · 2021-22
0.517 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason McAloon
Lake Forest · 2010-11
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joseph Sposit
Nichols · 2010-11
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.